Crime & Punishment Essay IELTS

Crime & Punishment Essay Titles

• The list below gives out essay titles on crime and punishment that might appear in the IELTS exam. These essay titles are based on common issues in the IELTS examination.
• Some people believe more actions can be taken to prevent crime, while others think that little can be done. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
• The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advances in technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
• Young people committing crimes should be treated the same as adults by the authorities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
• Watching TV shows and movies about the crime is becoming more and more popular. Why is this? What effect does that have on society?
• Not all drivers obey the laws while driving on roads. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to fix this problem?
• Some people believe that children that commit crimes should be punished. Others think the parents should be punished instead. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
• Many researchers believe that we can now study the behavior of children to see if they will grow up to be criminals, while others disagree. To what extent do you think crime is determined by genetics?
• The most common solution for criminal behavior is prison but many believe education is a better method. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
• In many countries, crime rates amongst younger people have been rising. Discuss the causes and solutions for this problem.
• Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted to do. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
• Some countries are struggling with increases in crime rates. Some believe that having more police on the streets is the best way to reduce and combat crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
• Crime rates will fall as advances in technology make it easier to detect and prevent crimes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
• Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
• Some countries are struggling with increases in crime rates. Some believe that having more police on the streets is the best way to reduce and combat crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
• Some people believe that violent media directly results in violent behavior. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
• Recent research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes after they are released. Why is this the case? What can be done to solve this problem?
• Some countries are considering imposing curfews in which teenagers will not be allowed outdoors at night unless they are accompanied by an adult. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this policy?
• Many people today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out. What are the causes? What are the solutions?

Also read: IELTS Eligibility Criteria

Crime and Punishment IELTS Essay Sample Question

Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Also read : IELTS Exam type

Crime and Punishment IELTS Essay Sample Answer

Some people debate whether criminals should always receive a set sentence for a specific act or whether the circumstances surrounding the crime should be taken into account before punishing the offender. This essay will look at both sides of the debate, but I personally lean toward the position that argues punishment should take into account the circumstances of a crime.

On the one hand, during the centuries of human history, criminal activity has greatly decreased. Fixed penalties for such horrific crimes as the death penalty and life in jail for drug trafficking serve as deterrents. Such brutal punishments ensured safety and stability in society because of their severity. For instance, several middle-income countries routinely rank near the top when it comes to obtaining a low-crime index because of their strict laws enforcing fixed sentences for certain offenses, according to a publication on criminal justice from the C.I.A. To protect the defenseless and hold the guilty accountable, however, is the basic goal of law and order. The primary goal of civil society frequently conflicts with fixed punishment.

Also read: IELTS Exam dates

On the other hand, prosecuting a criminal violates human rights, frequently without taking into account the circumstances that led to the act. Take Saudi Arabia, which is the nation with the lowest crime rate in the entire globe. Many human rights organizations have criticized the authorities for using a rigorous fundamentalist approach to prosecute convicts regardless of the circumstances of the crime. According to Amnesty International, even if offenders are wrongfully convicted, they are not entitled to fair trials. Last but not least, in my view, a convicted individual should only receive punishment depending on the specifics and seriousness of the offense. For instance, if someone kills in self-defense, the term should not be a life sentence.

In conclusion, I think that both sides of the debate—those in favor of and those opposed to set penalties—have valid points. However, I believe that punishments should be determined based on the individual circumstances of offenders and to deter future offenses.

Also read : IELTS test centers